gpt로 만든 문제
게시글 주소: https://i.orbi.kr/00068897475
### The Flaws in Evaluating by Merit
Meritocracy, the ostensibly equitable principle of appraising individuals based on their quantifiable achievements, harbors latent deficiencies that can surreptitiously perpetuate systemic inequities. It presupposes a uniform starting point for all, thereby neglecting the pervasive socio-economic disparities and entrenched biases that disproportionately favor the already advantaged. Consequently, those endowed with pre-existing privileges are more predisposed to thrive, exacerbating rather than ameliorating societal stratification.
This exclusive focus on merit reduces multifaceted human beings to mere aggregations of measurable success, disregarding intangible yet vital attributes such as empathy and creative ingenuity. Such an approach engenders a hyper-competitive milieu, prioritizing individualistic triumphs over collective welfare. Furthermore, the metrics of merit are frequently delineated by prevailing power structures, rendering them inherently subjective and partial.
**_____________________________**
Absent a critical reassessment, meritocracy risks devolving into a superficial construct, obfuscating the underlying power dynamics with a veneer of fairness.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. Therefore, meritocracy can be seen as a self-perpetuating system that inherently benefits those who are already in positions of power.
2. Thus, the glorification of merit can inadvertently cement the disparities it seeks to eliminate.
3. Consequently, a truly equitable society cannot be achieved without recognizing the limitations of merit-based evaluations.
4. As a result, the rhetoric of meritocracy may function as a tool for maintaining existing social hierarchies.
5. In conclusion, the ideal of meritocracy, while appealing in its simplicity, fails to account for the complexities of human experience and social dynamics.
이건 상
### The Flaws in Evaluating by Merit
Meritocracy—the idea of judging people based on their achievements—seems fair but has hidden flaws that can reinforce inequality. It assumes everyone starts equally, ignoring systemic issues like unequal access to education, resources, and biases that favor the privileged. Those with advantages are more likely to succeed, deepening disparities instead of bridging them.
Focusing solely on merit reduces people to measurable accomplishments, overlooking crucial traits like empathy and creativity. This creates a competitive environment that often prioritizes individual gain over collective well-being. Moreover, the criteria for merit are often shaped by those in power, making them subjective and biased.
**_____________________________**
Without addressing these issues, meritocracy becomes an illusion, masking the power and privilege behind a façade of fairness.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. Therefore, meritocracy can be seen as a self-perpetuating system that inherently benefits those who are already in positions of power.
2. Thus, the glorification of merit can inadvertently cement the disparities it seeks to eliminate.
3. Consequently, a truly equitable society cannot be achieved without recognizing the limitations of merit-based evaluations.
4. As a result, the rhetoric of meritocracy may function as a tool for maintaining existing social hierarchies.
5. In conclusion, the ideal of meritocracy, while appealing in its simplicity, fails to account for the complexities of human experience and social dynamics.
요건 하
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
영어 파이널 1
주로 2등급 가끔 3등급 뜨는데 영어 파이널 누가 제일 괜찮을까요? 김지영t 현강...
-
네네
-
바탕은 언매가 어렵다고 하니까 언매 바탕 독서 이감 이런식으로
-
이감 파이널 (시즌5, 시즌6) 다 풀었는데 이제 뭐할까? 2
이감 전회차를 푼 건 아니고 파이널에 해당하는 시즌5, 시즌6만 풀었음 이제 국어...
-
셔틀에 10명 넘게 있었는데 왜 나만 무는거야
-
개인적으로 어땠음??
-
스카 다닐 땐 6시간 자도 피곤했는데 잇올 다니니까 생활패턴 고정돼서 4시간 자도 무난쓰하구만
-
머리 개아픈데..
-
마지막 문장 ‘미루나무 그늘 아래에서 7월은 더위를 잊은 채 깜빡 잠이 들었다.’...
-
이런 경우 많은가요? 작년 이감은 다른 거랑 비슷하게 80 전후 나왔었는데 왜......
-
모래주머니효과 오히려좋아 ㅎㅎㅎㅎㅎ^^^^^
-
한번쓰면 지울 수 없어서 무지성으로 써내려가게 되지않고 충분히 고민해본 뒤에 쓰게됨
-
지구 물리 드디어 과탐 개념 다 끝났다! 근데 앞단원 개념들 벌써 까먹은 것 같아서...
-
감속팽창 질문 1
감속팽창한다고 해서 우주 파장이 짧아지는 건 아니죠? 여전히 팽창하니까 파장은 길어지나요?
-
치매인가봐 1
오늘아침약먹었는지안먹었는지기억이안남,,,
-
ㅇㅇ
-
졸립군아... 2
자게 해다오...
-
성공 3
-
아니 유튜브 이상한 댓글 밑에 대댓글들 다 로봇임? 2
무슨 300명이 똑같은말쓰냐
풀어봐요