문제 퀄 평가좀
게시글 주소: https://i.orbi.kr/00068898278
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
수학 실모 풀 때 문제 조건,발문 잘못 읽는건 어떻게 고쳐야할까요 3
그냥 집중력 문제라고 봐야하나... 맨날 문제의 발문,조건 잘못 읽어서 시간 엄청 많이 날려요 ㅠㅠ
-
6모 언미생지 23233이었는데요. 개인적인 사정으로 인해 거의 한달 동안 공부를...
-
N티켓 시즌1 푸는데 뭔가뭔가임... 얻을것도 없고 발상도없고 재미도 없고.. 그냥...
-
브라질 상파울루서 62명 탑승 여객기 추락…구조작업 진행 1
[워싱턴=뉴시스] 이윤희 특파원 = 9일(현지시각) 브라질 상파울루에 승객 수십명을...
-
체감될정도로 퀄리티가 다르다 이런게잇음?
-
기하라;;
-
히히 8
히히
-
브릿지?가 젤 유명하다고 하던데.. 중고거래로 사려고 하는데 걍 아무회차나 사서...
-
투표좀 해주세요 0
국민대학교 소프트웨어학부 VS 숭실대학교 컴퓨터학부
-
수특 공부가 완전 안 되어있는데 앱스키마 문학만 지금부터 들어도 되나요?
-
아 진짜 ㅈ같네 뭐지....
-
아직 해설을 안보고 밥먹으러 와서 모르는데 f(1) 지나는 기울기 -1직선이랑...
-
아까답인데 0
존나어려운거맞지?
-
젠지 ㅋㅋ 0
엄 ㅋㅋ
-
킬러지문 모음집 1
없을까요 옛기출부터 쫙 보고싶은데
-
오르새 모고 0
뭐이리 어렵지.. 어려운 거 맞음? 준킬러라면서 킬러만 모아놧네
-
문학 감으로 풀어서 거의다 맞는 편인데 들으면 도움 될까?
-
그냥 생각하는 거조차 싫다는 거겠죠? 헤어지고 엄청 매달렸다가... 최근에 잘...
-
불쾌한건 둘째치고 연출 디테일 하나하나가 진짜 지리네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
-
논술 해본 적도 없긴한데...
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ