문제 퀄 평가좀
게시글 주소: https://i.orbi.kr/00068898278
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
아까답인데 0
존나어려운거맞지?
-
젠지 ㅋㅋ 0
엄 ㅋㅋ
-
킬러지문 모음집 1
없을까요 옛기출부터 쫙 보고싶은데
-
오르새 모고 0
뭐이리 어렵지.. 어려운 거 맞음? 준킬러라면서 킬러만 모아놧네
-
문학 감으로 풀어서 거의다 맞는 편인데 들으면 도움 될까?
-
불쾌한건 둘째치고 연출 디테일 하나하나가 진짜 지리네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
-
논술 해본 적도 없긴한데...
-
..
-
사탐런 조언 3
7/22에 윤사 시작해서 Lim it 30/40강 들었어요 ㅜㅜ 마더텅+Impact...
-
사회계 모논 봤는데 2번이 ㅈ댐... 3번은 마지막에 평가하라는거 누락해서 좀 까인거 같은데
-
이쯤에 나오는실검 !
-
저는 고2이지만 제가 이 때까지 들은 대성 수학 인강 후기를 알리고 다른 분들에게...
-
쪽지 부탁드립니다 ㅠㅠ
-
난이도 : 중 두 은 간 다 룹 표 서 해 을 최 기 남 우 를 목 이 리 시 다 선 모
-
언매 처음 독학하려히는데 책 추천좀 해주세용
-
사장님한테 역까지 태워달라함 테슬라 첨 타봐서 문 어케 여닫는지 몰라서 좀 해맴
-
ㅈㄴ처놀아서 지금 화학 1단원에 생명 유전 개념듣는 중인데 어떡해요 고2...
-
박종민T 0
개인컨 어떤거 있는지 아시는 분 있나요? 각각 가격이 얼만가요
-
내신 몇 이신가요..?
-
올해도 역시나네요.. 다 포기하고 수능만 바라봤는데 안 되는건 안 되나봅니다....
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ